SATA like all electronic developments is just another step into finding better and more efficient both in speed and power consumption ways of delivering performance. How many Brits even know that in 1940 the UK actually invaded part of Iceland - rather to the bemusement at the time of the locals I have heard though - eventually the base was handed over to the USA where it remained a NATO base for many years - now it's the main International airport at keflavik.Īs for the topic in question - RAID 0 will speed up your backup by over 50% - the problem with any sort of optimised file compression for taking the backup on Windows is the appalingly hideous performance by today's standards of the NTFS file system. GB was way ahead of USA in this area at that time so a lot of the stuff people like Flowers did had to remain as Govt secrets - some of the work done at Bletchley Park in England has only been recently released. It wasn't that they would have been forgotten - but at the end of WWII the USA and GB almost came to blows against each other !! and there was absolute paranoia about this new technology - cyber cracking, cryptography and electronic switching - the basis for computers. Why is SATA seemingly on the way out if it handles data so provlima Some more history for you : !!! These are men largely forgotten by history. Postal worker Tommy Flowers stroke of genius changed the course of history. Very interesting conversations and even learned about a little history Over the years I've found a bottleneck in computers is invariably slow I/O rather than lack of CPU compute power or RAM (assuming those 2 items are adequate - as they are on modern computers). If you've got slow HDD's the try RAID 0 - but do have backup as on any HDD in the array failure will cause you to lose the whole kybosh. The application also verifies on the target HDD as it copies the data so doesn't also need a separate verify step. RAID 0 Risky but for speed absolutely well worth it - Windows 10 Forums Here's a link to the post with the speeds etc.
Target HDD was a self powered 2 TB WD passport USB 3 external drive.
I recently copied over 400 GB from a NAS type server running as a VM on Windows 10 Pro host with only a Celeron 2.4 GHZ dual core cpu - approx equiv to an i3. I repeat what I have said again - on the whole it's NOT CPU speed that's important here - but how the I/O is configured.
0 kommentar(er)
